Skip to Content
When comparing different intelligence models, there is a spectrum, with some that seem more outlandish and others that seem more down-to-earth.
When comparing different intelligence models, there is a spectrum, with some that seem more outlandish and others that seem more down-to-earth.
Avery Bowen

How We Define Intelligence

Different models of intelligence raise questions about school structure
Categories:

In the dynamic landscape of American public education, the definition of intelligence stands as a linchpin, shaping the trajectories of countless students. As we traverse this landscape, the various models of intelligence lead to a crossroads—should we maintain the status quo or shift in a new direction?

Beyond these models, the American education system continues to rely on standardized tests like the SAT and ACT, each with its own set of strengths and limitations. While these tests provide stability and comparability, skeptics argue that they may oversimplify student potential. IQ tests, designed to assess cognitive prowess, have also faced criticism for the challenge of encapsulating intelligence within a single numerical score, as noted by intelligence researcher Dr. James Flynn.

 

These intelligence tests are designed to test both crystallized, meaning learned procedures/knowledge, and fluid intelligence, the ability to reason in novel situations. Whether or not they actually do that effectively is up for debate, with critics claiming these tests emphasize memorization and test-taking skills over genuine cognitive abilities.

 

As the debate unfolds, proponents of change argue for a more dynamic understanding of intelligence, embracing diverse models that allow for a nuanced assessment of student abilities. Critics of change, however, emphasize the stability provided by established models, citing the clarity and consistency they offer in an already complex educational system. Whether to uphold the familiar or shift in a new direction is a question that demands careful consideration, recognizing that the future of education lies in our willingness to adapt and evolve.

About the Contributors
Anthony Bruns
Anthony Bruns, Reporter
Anthony Bruns is a senior and this is his first year in journalism. He enjoys drawing, playing guitar, reading, and discussing philosophy/religion. Anthony is also a part of Chamber Choir and FCA’s Leadership Team. After high school, he plans on pursuing a career in computer science. At the same time, he’d like to continue his study of philosophy/religion on the side, and possibly full-time in the future.

Avery Bowen
Avery Bowen, Graphic Design Editor
Avery Bowen is a senior and this is their second year in publications. She is also involved in drama club, working as a crew head for set, and Earth Club as the social media manager. Outside of school, Avery can usually be found quietly drawing in their room or taking a nap. When not hanging out in her room, Avery is outside in nature walking along her backyard creek and fishing. After high school they plan on studying wildlife biology at an out-of-state college.